Sign inStarta project

Environmental assessment · example

Anchor Point Housing

A 19-unit affordable rental development in Gold Beach: an existing two-story building becomes 16 studios, and a new building adds two studios and one two-bedroom unit, with supportive services for seniors and domestic violence survivors.1

Facts from Oregon Housing and Community Services public records, each linked by number to its source; checked November 13, 2026. Section notes by ePlan.

At a glance

Where
29793 and 29795 Ellensburg Avenue, Gold Beach, Curry County, Oregon, between Caughell and Gauntlett Streets1
Size
19 units on about 1.15 acres; a 9,849 square foot building reused, plus an 832 square foot new unit1
Lead agency
Oregon Housing and Community Services (responsible entity); grant recipient Coos Curry Housing Authority1
Review
Environmental assessment, with a finding of no significant impact1
Legal citation
24 CFR 58.40(g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.131
Status
Review ended June 23, 2026; certified by the Certifying Officer August 28, 2026 and Authorizing Officer September 1, 20261

Timeline

  1. Review start1
  2. Tribal consultation initiated1
  3. SHPO consultation initiated1
  4. Community meeting1
  5. Review end1
  6. 7015.15 certified1
  7. 7015.16 certified1

Documents Oregon Housing and Community Services published

What the documents say

HEROS ERR (Environmental Assessment, 24 CFR Part 58)

Description of the Proposed Project
Describes a 19-unit project: 16 studios in a reused 9,849 sq ft building, three new units, project-based vouchers, a community room and service office.1
Compliance with 24 CFR §50.4, §58.5 and §58.6 Laws and Authorities
Finds compliance for airports, flood, air quality, noise, wetlands and others; NMFS formal consultation found likely adverse effect on listed species, requiring mitigation.1
Environmental Assessment Factors
Rates most factors as no impact; beneficial for education, parks and energy; notes C-4 commercial zoning needing rezoning to residential and a geotechnical report showing Site Class D.1
Alternatives and No Action Alternative
Two site designs were compared; the final one adds stormwater treatment and onsite parking. No action would leave the aging building and gravel lot unchanged.1
Summary of Findings and Conclusions
Concludes impacts are limited to minor short-term construction effects and the project would not significantly affect the human environment.1
Mitigation Measures and Conditions
Requires stormwater facility inspection and maintenance under a post-construction plan with a completion report within 60 days, and an Inadvertent Discovery Plan for ground disturbance.1

Start one like it.

A project like Anchor Point Housing? Describe yours and ePlan drafts the environmental review record. What will the HUD money pay for?

More examples

HUD environmental review · All Federal NEPA projects

Sources

  1. HEROS ERR (Environmental Assessment, 24 CFR Part 58)cpd.hud.gov