Sign inStarta project

Environmental assessment · example

North Fork Forest Recovery Project

Fuels reduction, reforestation, invasive species control, stream and meadow work, road maintenance and trail work after the 2021 Dixie Fire, to speed forest recovery and reduce wildfire risk to nearby communities.2

Facts from USDA Forest Service public records, each linked by number to its source; checked November 13, 2026. Section notes by ePlan.

At a glance

Where
Mt. Hough Ranger District, Plumas County, California: from the Lassen National Forest boundary up the North Fork Feather River Canyon, to the southern tip of Lake Almanor, and down through Indian and Genesee Valleys.1
Size
166,889 acres2
Lead agency
USDA Forest Service, Plumas National Forest, Mt. Hough Ranger District1
Review
Environmental assessment, with a finding of no significant impact documented in a decision notice2
Legal citation
Notice and comment regulation 218 (2013), Non-HFRA1
Status
Decision signed June 23, 2025; project marked completed1

Timeline

  1. Scoping Start1
  2. Comment Period1
  3. Objection Period Start1
  4. Decision signed1

Documents USDA Forest Service published

What the documents say

NFFRP FinalDN June2025 (FS Signed)

Introduction
Describes the 166,889-acre project area in the Mt. Hough Ranger District after the 2021 Dixie Fire, including its watershed role and State Highway 70 landslide risk.2
Purpose and Need: Why do we need to act?
Sets two purposes, community protection with strategic fire management and forest and watershed health, with listed needs such as fuels reduction, invasive control and meadow improvement.2
Decision
Selects the Proposed Action Alternative and authorizes ten treatment types, including prescribed fire, variable-density thinning, hazard tree removal, reforestation, herbicide use and about 7 miles of trails.2

NFFRP DN FONSI Draft 20241104

Introduction
Draft version describes the same 166,889-acre area, communities affected by the Dixie Fire, and the North Fork Feather River watershed.3
Purpose and Need: Why do we need to act?
Draft states the same two purposes and lists community protection and watershed needs.3
Decision
Draft selects the Proposed Action Alternative, referencing the November 2024 EA, and lists the same ten treatment types.3

R5SignedEmergencyResponseNFFRPGreenvilleTaylorsville

Issue
Requests Chief's approval under 36 CFR 220.4(b)(2) for emergency work on about 700 acres near Greenville and Taylorsville before the final EA and FONSI.4
Background
Explains the need: burned trees near Greenville are deteriorating and green forest near Taylorsville is vulnerable, with design features limiting effects.4
Recommendation
Recommends approving the emergency response with conditions, including legal compliance, monitoring, and finishing the work by October 31, 2025.4

Start one like it.

A project like North Fork Forest Recovery Project? Describe yours and ePlan drafts the scoping letter. Which national forest is the project on?

More examples

Forest Service NEPA · Plumas National Forest projects · All Forest Service projects

Sources

  1. North Fork Forest Recovery Project: Forest Service project pagefs.usda.gov
  2. NFFRP FinalDN June2025 (FS Signed)usfs-public.app.box.com
  3. NFFRP DN FONSI Draft 20241104usfs-public.app.box.com
  4. R5SignedEmergencyResponseNFFRPGreenvilleTaylorsvilleusfs-public.app.box.com