Skip to content

NEPA timeline: how long a CE, an EA and an EIS take, from agency data

A NEPA timeline runs from a review's start to decision. At the Forest Service, 2005 to 2021, the median categorical exclusion took 110 days, an environmental assessment 441 and an EIS 1,041[1]. The law now gives an EA 1 year and an EIS 2[2]. Government-wide, the median EIS took 2.2 years from notice of intent to final EIS in 2024[3].

By Ilya Volodarsky. 7 sources, last read on . This page explains the law; it is not legal advice.

Start the EA Draft for a Fuels Project

    ePlan gets you

    • A first draft of your Environmental Assessment, from a project description or the files you already have
    • Precedent research: analog projects and their documents, found for you
    • Every fact ePlan can't confirm, marked for your team to fill in
    • A Word download, plus tasks and a Gantt timeline on Pro and Max
    See how it compares

    Describe the project and ePlan drafts the EA with the deadline and page limit stated up front, so review time goes to the analysis; every fact it can't confirm is marked for you.

    ePlan vs. by hand

    How ePlan compares to drafting an Environmental Assessment by hand

    The same document, two ways to a first draft.

    ComparedePlan.aiBy hand
    ScheduleePlan.aiTasks and a Gantt timeline for the review on Pro and Max, next to the draftBy handA schedule in a spreadsheet, kept apart from the document
    Starting pointePlan.aiA plain-language project description, or the PDFs, Word files and GIS files (shapefile, GeoJSON, KML, GeoPackage) you already haveBy handA blank template, or last year's document retyped
    Precedent researchePlan.aiA research agent searches agency project pages, CEQAnet, the Federal Register, eCFR and EPA's EIS database for your project and up to two analog projectsBy handSearching each agency site and PDF library by hand
    Missing factsePlan.aiEvery fact ePlan can't confirm stays a highlighted [INSERT] placeholder until someone fills itBy handGaps surface in review, or not at all
    Cost to startePlan.aiScoping letters are free. EAs, EIRs and decision memos are on Max at $199 a monthBy handStaff or consultant hours for every draft

    ePlan.ai as of October 2026. “By hand” means a Word template, past documents and agency PDFs. Your team reviews, edits and signs every draft.

    How long does each level of NEPA review take?

    The level of review sets the clock more than anything else. In the authors' updated Forest Service data, decisions signed from 2005 to 2021, the median categorical exclusion took 110 days from the scoping notice to the signed decision memo, the median EA 441 days and the median EIS 1,041[1]. Most EAs and nearly every EIS took more than a year.

    Forest Service NEPA decisions signed 2005 to 2021, days from initiation to signed decision. ePlan.ai analysis of the PALS data.
    Level of reviewDecisionsMedianMiddle halfOver 1 year
    Categorical exclusion (decision memo)32,208110 days52 to 241 days15%
    Environmental assessment (decision notice)6,405441 days232 to 769 days59%
    EIS (record of decision)7591,041 days626 to 1,645 days92%

    Are NEPA reviews getting faster at the Forest Service?

    Only categorical exclusions are. From 2005 to 2020, the median CE fell from 118 to 95 days, while the median EA rose from 429 to 614 days and the median EIS from 802 to 1,938, as the decisions signed each year fell by half[1]. The authors found the agency starting less than half as many projects a year as before 2010[4].

    Median days from initiation to signed decision, by year signed. ePlan.ai analysis of the PALS data; EIS years rest on 25 to 66 decisions each.
    Year signedCEEAEISDecisions signed
    20051184298023,064
    20081243709353,045
    2011974401,1042,563
    20141154849202,055
    20171165291,3301,934
    2020956141,9381,553

    EIS timeline across federal agencies

    CEQ tracked 1,903 EISs from notice of intent to final EIS. The median fell from 3.2 years for those finished in 2010 to 2018 to 2.8 years in 2019 to 2024, and to 2.2 years in 2024, when 41% finished within two years. A record of decision followed the final EIS by a median 2.8 months[3].

    The lead agency matters as much as the year. In CEQ's data for 2019 to 2024, FERC's median EIS took about 1 year and FHWA's 4.5; the Forest Service's took 3.8 years, and 17% of its EISs finished within two[5].

    Final EISs issued 2019 to 2024: median years from notice of intent to final EIS, lead agencies with 20 or more. ePlan.ai analysis of CEQ's data.
    Lead agencyCountMedianWithin 2 years
    All agencies5252.8 years34%
    FERC491.0 year76%
    Air Force212.1 years48%
    Fish and Wildlife Service212.6 years43%
    BLM892.7 years33%
    NOAA333.2 years27%
    Army Corps of Engineers473.3 years17%
    Forest Service693.8 years17%
    FHWA264.5 years12%

    NEPA deadlines: 1 year for an EA, 2 years for an EIS

    Since 2023, a lead agency must finish an EA within 1 year and an EIS within 2, counted from the earliest of its decision to prepare one, its notice that a right-of-way application is complete, or its notice of intent. If it can't, it may set a new deadline, in consultation with the applicant, with only as much extra time as needed[2].

    Measured against those limits, 59% of the Forest Service's EAs took more than a year to decide, and 68% of its EISs more than two years to the record of decision[1]. Under the limits, 64 of the 142 EIS notices of intent published June 2023 to September 2024 (45.1%) reached a final EIS within two years of the notice, in our analysis of EPA's EIS database[6].

    Outline

    How to plan a NEPA timeline

    Steps that move the date, from the statute[2], CEQ's data[3] and the Forest Service record[1]; your agency's procedures set the rest.

    1. Choose the level of review first

      At the Forest Service, a median CE took a quarter of an EA's time[1]. Check the categorical exclusions first; signed examples show what fits.

    2. Fix the start date

      The EA or EIS clock starts at the earliest of the decision to prepare it, a complete right-of-way application or the notice of intent[2].

    3. Run consultations alongside scoping

      Start Section 106 and ESA Section 7 early rather than after the draft.

    4. Plan the comment period

      Forest Service: 30 days for an EA, 45 for a draft EIS[7].

    5. Hold the page limits

      75 pages for an EA, 150 for an EIS, 300 if extraordinarily complex, not counting citations or appendices[2].

    6. Budget for the decision

      Across agencies, a record of decision followed the final EIS by a median 2.8 months[3].

    7. Extend only with a new date

      A missed deadline needs a new one, set with the applicant and no longer than necessary[2].

    Sources

    Where each statement comes from

    Show all 7 sources
    1. [1]US Forest Service Data on Planning, Appeals, Litigation and NEPA compliance, 2005-2021 (Fleischman, Struthers, Arnold, Dockry, Scott). University of Minnesota, Data Repository for U of M (DRUM), November 2022. Read October 3, 2026.
    2. [2]42 U.S.C. 4336a - Timely and unified Federal reviews. United States Code, 2023 edition (GovInfo). Read October 2, 2026.
    3. [3]Environmental Impact Statement Timelines (2010-2024). Council on Environmental Quality, January 13, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    4. [4]US Forest Service Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act: Fast, Variable, Rarely Litigated, and Declining (Journal of Forestry 118(4)). Fleischman et al., Journal of Forestry, April 27, 2020. Read October 3, 2026.
    5. [5]EIS Timeline Data, 2010-2024 (spreadsheet behind CEQ's 2025 report). Council on Environmental Quality, January 13, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    6. [6]ePlan.ai analysis of 1,122 EPA EIS database records and 142 post-2023 EIS notices of intent. ePlan.ai. Read October 4, 2026.
    7. [7]36 CFR 218.24 - Notification of opportunity to comment on proposed projects and activities (Forest Service). Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), current. Read October 2, 2026.

    Written by

    Ilya Volodarsky

    Ilya Volodarsky founded ePlan.ai. He co-founded Segment and is co-founder and CEO of Wildfires.org.

    XGitHub

    Pricing

    Pick your plan

    One workspace price per plan, powered by shared credits. Draft environmental planning documents in minutes, not weeks.

    Starter
    $0/month

    Try AI environmental planning

    Starter AI Planning

    • Basic Research agents
    • Generate CEQA/NEPA scoping letters
    • GIS shapefile & unit tracking support
    • 3 seats included
    • 5,000 credits/mo
    • 3 active projects
    Most popular
    Pro
    $99/month

    Get AI environmental planning right from day 1

    Pro AI Planning

    • Precedent (EA) research
    • Realtime task + gantt task management
    • Upload surveys
    • 5 seats included
    • 30,000 credits/mo
    • +$29/mo per extra seat (adds 5,000 credits)
    • Unlimited projects, docs, contractors
    Max
    $199/month

    Scale AI environmental planning

    Agentic Planning Team

    • All AI Env Docs (EA/EIR/Decision Memos)
    • Contract generation
    • Team/contractor/citizen collaboration
    • 10 seats included
    • 75,000 credits/mo
    • +$29/mo per extra seat (adds 7,500 credits)
    • Unlimited projects, docs, contractors
    • Priority support
    EnterpriseCustom
    • ArcGIS/Esri + custom integrations
    • Custom planning agents + credits
    • Government security + SSO/SAML
    • Dedicated onboarding + SLA
    FAQ

    Frequently asked questions

    • It depends on the level of review. Forest Service medians for 2005 to 2021 were 110 days for a categorical exclusion, 441 for an environmental assessment and 1,041 for an EIS. Across federal agencies, the median EIS took 2.2 years from notice of intent to final EIS in 2024.

    Guides

    Keep reading