Skip to content

Decision memo examples (FANECs): 12 signed Forest Service categorical exclusions, by category

Decision memo examples are signed records of a categorical exclusion: the finding that a project fits an excluded category with no extraordinary circumstances[1]. Below are 12 from Forest Service project pages, one per commonly used category, each with its old 36 CFR 220.6 citation[2], its 7 CFR 1b.4 number[3] and the days it took.

By Ilya Volodarsky. 21 sources, last read on . This page explains the law; it is not legal advice.

Draft a Decision Memo for a Fiber Optic Line

    ePlan gets you

    • A first draft of your Decision Memo, from a project description or the files you already have
    • Precedent research: analog projects and their documents, found for you
    • Every fact ePlan can't confirm, marked for your team to fill in
    • A Word download, plus tasks and a Gantt timeline on Pro and Max
    See how it compares

    Describe the project and ePlan finds signed decision memos for projects like it, then drafts yours in that structure under the current 7 CFR 1b.4 number; every fact it can't confirm is marked for you.

    ePlan vs. by hand

    How ePlan compares to drafting a Decision Memo by hand

    The same document, two ways to a first draft.

    ComparedePlan.aiBy hand
    Old citationsePlan.aiDrafts under the current 7 CFR 1b.4 number and marks anything it can't confirmBy handMemos signed before July 2025 cite 36 CFR 220.6
    Starting pointePlan.aiA plain-language project description, or the PDFs, Word files and GIS files (shapefile, GeoJSON, KML, GeoPackage) you already haveBy handA blank template, or last year's document retyped
    Precedent researchePlan.aiFinds signed decision memos for projects like yours on Forest Service project pagesBy handOpening project pages forest by forest for a memo under the same category
    Missing factsePlan.aiEvery fact ePlan can't confirm stays a highlighted [INSERT] placeholder until someone fills itBy handGaps surface in review, or not at all
    Cost to startePlan.aiScoping letters are free. EAs, EIRs and decision memos are on Max at $199 a monthBy handStaff or consultant hours for every draft

    ePlan.ai as of October 2026. “By hand” means a Word template, past documents and agency PDFs. Your team reviews, edits and signs every draft.

    Forest Service decision memo examples by category

    Each row is a signed decision memo from a national forest's project page, the newest in our sample for each common category. Copy the structure, not the facts, and check current limits in 7 CFR 1b.4[6].

    Old 36 CFR 220.6 category and its 7 CFR 1b.4 number, a signed example, its days from scoping to signature, and the median for every sampled memo in that category.
    CategoryExampleForestScoping to signed (days)Category median (days)
    Special uses under 20 acres: (e)(3), now USDA-28d-USFSVerizon Communication Site, Datil: propane tank and generator pads[7]Cibola, New Mexico6095
    Timber stand or wildlife habitat improvement: (e)(6), now USDA-30d-USFS, set asideBee Canyon: 18,720 feet of fence keeping cattle out of riparian habitat[8]Apache-Sitgreaves, Arizona329135
    Trails: (e)(1), now USDA-26d-USFSEnoree Palmetto Trail: 6.3 miles moved off forest roads[9]Francis Marion and Sumter, South Carolina195120
    Short-term mineral investigations: (e)(8), now USDA-32d-USFSCuddy Mountain: exploratory drilling at 17 sites from existing roads[10]Payette, Idaho103194
    Restoring streams and wetlands: (e)(18), now USDA-40d-USFSBig Wood River tributaries: three culverts blocking fish passage replaced[11]Sawtooth, Idaho186159
    Utility lines in a corridor: (e)(2), now USDA-27d-USFSMerit Fiber Optic Amendment 5: broadband to three Michigan counties[12]Hiawatha, Michigan4959
    Aquatic habitat structures: (e)(7), now USDA-31d-USFSMiddle Upper Grande Ronde Phase II: large wood added for fish habitat[13]Wallowa-Whitman, Oregon29202
    Recreation sites: (e)(22), now USDA-44d-USFSPuskus Lake: old toilets, shed and a decommissioned well removed[14]National Forests in Mississippi242119
    Allotment management practices: (e)(9), now USDA-33d-USFSGoose Fire Fences: 1.83 miles of burned range fence rebuilt[15]Beaverhead-Deerlodge, Montana229155
    Sanitation harvest up to 250 acres: (e)(14), now USDA-37d-USFSFourth of July Creek: tree removal against insects and disease[16]Salmon-Challis, Idaho302109
    Salvage up to 250 acres: (e)(13), now USDA-36d-USFSMcBride Fire: hazard trees removed on about 10 acres[17]Lincoln, New Mexico213116
    Road and trail stabilization: (e)(20), now USDA-42d-USFSFlatlands Road: 1.4 miles closed to motor vehicles[18]Chattahoochee-Oconee, Georgia113100

    Which categorical exclusions does the Forest Service use most?

    We read a random sample of 800 of the Forest Service's roughly 29,000 project pages; 794 loaded. Of those, 601 were decision memos, 144 EAs and 25 EISs. One category dominates: minor special uses, 36 CFR 220.6(e)(3), in 27% of the decision memos. Next came timber stand and wildlife habitat improvement (14%), trails (9%) and reissued special use permits (9%).

    Reissued permits, once 220.6(e)(15), sit on the list that needs no decision memo as (d)(11) in the 2025 text[2].

    Reading an old decision memo under 7 CFR 1b

    USDA moved the Forest Service's categories into 7 CFR 1b.4 in 2025 and finalized it on April 3, 2026: 220.6(d) became USDA-19c to 29c-USFS, less the ski-area CE (27c) removed in 2026, and 220.6(e) became USDA-26d to 47d-USFS, with documentation still required for the same categories[3]. See the full crosswalk.

    In Oregon Wild v. U.S. Forest Service, a federal court set aside USDA-30d-USFS, the old (e)(6), on January 13, 2026; decisions signed by then could proceed[4][3]. The Forest Service appealed, then dropped the appeal in September 2026[19]. The record is now a finding of applicability and no extraordinary circumstance, or FANEC[1].

    Decision memo template (2026)

    The Forest Service's 2009 decision memo template[20] covers the FANEC minimum elements in 7 CFR 1b.3(g)[1]; renumber its category and drop one heading.

    2009 template headings and their status now.
    2009 headingIn a FANEC
    DecisionKeep: the action, its category and fit, resources considered, no extraordinary circumstances[1]
    Findings required by other lawsKeep, as records incorporated by reference[1]
    Administrative review (appeal)Drop: CEs are outside 36 CFR 218 objections[21]
    Background, public involvement, implementation date, contactNot minimum elements; work may start once signed[1]
    SignatureKeep, with the date[1]
    Outline

    How to adapt a decision memo example to your project

    Use the example for structure only; the numbers come from 7 CFR 1b.4[6].

    1. Match the category, then its limits

      Acres, miles of road and herbicide limits differ by category; your project, not the example's, must fit them[6].

    2. Renumber the citation

      Replace 36 CFR 220.6 with the 7 CFR 1b.4 number; trails, (e)(1), are now USDA-26d-USFS[3].

    3. Rewrite the proposed action

      Location, acres or miles, activities and timing, in enough detail to show the category fits[1].

    4. Redo the resource screen

      Screen your own site's listed species, wetlands, roadless areas and historic properties; never carry over another project's findings[1].

    5. Run your own consultations

      The example's Section 106 and ESA Section 7 records cover its site, not yours.

    Sources

    Where each statement comes from

    Show all 21 sources
    1. [1]7 CFR 1b.3 - Categorical exclusions and findings of applicability and no extraordinary circumstance (USDA). Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), current. Read October 2, 2026.
    2. [2]36 CFR 220.6 - Categorical exclusions (Forest Service), as of January 1, 2025. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), point in time. Read October 3, 2026.
    3. [3]National Environmental Policy Act (USDA final rule), 91 FR 17062. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Register, April 3, 2026. Read October 2, 2026.
    4. [4]Oregon Wild v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 1:22-cv-01007-MC, Opinion and Order (ECF No. 88). U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (RECAP copy, CourtListener), January 13, 2026. Read October 4, 2026.
    5. [5]US Forest Service Data on Planning, Appeals, Litigation and NEPA compliance, 2005-2021 (Fleischman, Struthers, Arnold, Dockry, Scott). University of Minnesota, Data Repository for U of M (DRUM), November 2022. Read October 3, 2026.
    6. [6]7 CFR 1b.4 - Categorical exclusion of USDA subcomponents and actions. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), current. Read October 2, 2026.
    7. [7]Verizon Communication Site - Datil (#67340). USDA Forest Service, Cibola National Forest, February 4, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    8. [8]Bee Canyon Cattle Exclusion Structures & Water Supply Improvements (#65990). USDA Forest Service, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, January 8, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    9. [9]Enoree Palmetto Trail Re-route (#66760). USDA Forest Service, Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests, February 26, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    10. [10]Cuddy Mountain Exploration Drilling (#67280). USDA Forest Service, Payette National Forest, August 6, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    11. [11]Big Wood River Tributaries Aquatic Organism Passage Project (#66407). USDA Forest Service, Sawtooth National Forest, December 30, 2024. Read October 3, 2026.
    12. [12]Merit Fiber Optic Amendment 5 (#68465). USDA Forest Service, Hiawatha National Forest, August 18, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    13. [13]Middle Upper Grande Ronde River Restoration Phase II (#62754). USDA Forest Service, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, September 22, 2022. Read October 3, 2026.
    14. [14]Removal of Old Facilities at Puskus Lake Recreation Area (#66953). USDA Forest Service, National Forests in Mississippi, June 2, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    15. [15]Goose Fire Fences (#66859). USDA Forest Service, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, June 24, 2025. Read October 3, 2026.
    16. [16]Fourth of July Creek Vegetation Management (#62994). USDA Forest Service, Salmon-Challis National Forest, October 18, 2023. Read October 3, 2026.
    17. [17]McBride Post Fire Vegetation Treatment at Warrior Drive and Gavilan Road (#63766). USDA Forest Service, Lincoln National Forest, October 19, 2023. Read October 3, 2026.
    18. [18]Flatlands Road Closure Project (#63980). USDA Forest Service, Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests, August 8, 2023. Read October 3, 2026.
    19. [19]Oregon Wild v. United States Forest Service, No. 1:22-cv-01007 (D. Or.), docket, including the appeal to the Ninth Circuit (No. 26-3137) and its dismissal. CourtListener (Free Law Project), from PACER. Read October 4, 2026.
    20. [20]Decision Memo (template, Microsoft Word). USDA Forest Service, NEPA templates, August 2009. Read October 4, 2026.
    21. [21]36 CFR part 218 - Project-Level Predecisional Administrative Review Process (Forest Service). Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), current. Read October 4, 2026.

    Written by

    Ilya Volodarsky

    Ilya Volodarsky founded ePlan.ai. He co-founded Segment and is co-founder and CEO of Wildfires.org.

    XGitHub

    Pricing

    Pick your plan

    One workspace price per plan, powered by shared credits. Draft environmental planning documents in minutes, not weeks.

    Starter
    $0/month

    Try AI environmental planning

    Starter AI Planning

    • Basic Research agents
    • Generate CEQA/NEPA scoping letters
    • GIS shapefile & unit tracking support
    • 3 seats included
    • 5,000 credits/mo
    • 3 active projects
    Most popular
    Pro
    $99/month

    Get AI environmental planning right from day 1

    Pro AI Planning

    • Precedent (EA) research
    • Realtime task + gantt task management
    • Upload surveys
    • 5 seats included
    • 30,000 credits/mo
    • +$29/mo per extra seat (adds 5,000 credits)
    • Unlimited projects, docs, contractors
    Max
    $199/month

    Scale AI environmental planning

    Agentic Planning Team

    • All AI Env Docs (EA/EIR/Decision Memos)
    • Contract generation
    • Team/contractor/citizen collaboration
    • 10 seats included
    • 75,000 credits/mo
    • +$29/mo per extra seat (adds 7,500 credits)
    • Unlimited projects, docs, contractors
    • Priority support
    EnterpriseCustom
    • ArcGIS/Esri + custom integrations
    • Custom planning agents + credits
    • Government security + SSO/SAML
    • Dedicated onboarding + SLA
    FAQ

    Frequently asked questions

    • On each national forest's project pages at fs.usda.gov. A completed project's page lists its decision date and category and links its documents, including the signed decision memo.

    Guides

    Keep reading